Justice in China: Showing the way with forensic voice comparison
Project Summary
Legal justice hinges on the quality of forensic evidence evaluation. This is particularly true for forensic voice comparison (FVC) in China, where the scientific bases of methods and procedures are limited. A recent survey revealed a number of serious issues, notably 1) the lack of empirical validation of features analysed by FVC practitioners; 2) potential overestimation of the strength of voice evidence when using the current conclusion framework; and 3) the lack of specific strategies for mitigating cognitive bias induced by exposure to task-irrelevant information. This project aims to improve the quality of analysis in FVC cases in China by 1) empirically validating a number of speech features commonly used in FVC casework in Mandarin; and 2) exploring Chinese FVC practitioners’ perspectives on issues related to conclusion frameworks and cognitive bias.
Our project findings will have a direct impact on FVC practitioners’ evaluation of Mandarin speech evidence in the future. Specifically, our results will assist them in making informed decisions about which speech sounds to analyse and how best to analyze them forensically. The findings will also help practitioners avoid cognitive bias and express their conclusions using an appropriate framework. Theoretically, the findings will contribute to a comprehensive model explaining where speaker-specific information is encoded in the speech signal and why individual voices differ from one another. Ultimately, the anticipated improvement in forensic analysis of Mandarin speech evidence will result in a decrease in miscarriages of justice in China and Chinese communities worldwide.
Collaborators: Dr. Bruce X. Wang, Prof. Paul Foulkes, Prof Cuiling Zhang